Archive for February, 2011

The Lynx Effect

Friday, February 25th, 2011

This week saw Lynx launch its new Facebook game where you try to bed….sorry I mean release Kelly Brook (a fallen angel). Now I’ll be honest I was really interested in this game when I heard about it. When I read about it in a national newspaper on Monday I immediately logged on and ‘liked’ the Facebook page. However here was my first bit of disappointment – although the media coverage claimed all you had to do was log on now to play the game, when I did it wasn’t working there were just a few pictures of Kelly Brook as an angel.

Anyway after waiting a couple of days it did eventually become live and so here’s my short review.

It starts with a nice video introduction involving a trio of girls (if I was being overly critical I’d say that the group were distinctly average – they certainly weren’t stunning but neither were they hideously ugly). Anyway the first bit of personalisation occurs now as during the video you see friends profile pictures flash up and the girls claim that <enter name here> poked them…

The game then becomes little more than a mere question and answer game (I don’t think the answers matter really)! Eventually after playing for about 10 minutes and answering a selection of utterly random and pretty boring questions you free Kelly from her prison at which time you’re allowed to select an outfit for her to wear before a final cut-scene plays. I’ll be honest part of the highlight of the game was seeing Kelly Brook longingly holding a photo of me (see below).

In all honesty it’s a nicely executed game but unfortunately too long and coupled with the lack of any actual competition mechanic so I wont be going back to play it again. One thing that does deserve credit however is the personalistion, from seeing friend profile pictures and names to being able to type in your post code for your first date with Kelly.

I’d recommend you go and have a look and while you’ve got some free time why not also try out the Panda Liquorice Blocks Game – it’s kind of Tetris crossed with Jenga and is pretty addictive so be warned!

Share

The Great Manchester Debate

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Manchester, so much to answer for. That’s what Morrissey said, and, for the second time in recent weeks, The Daily Mail too.

Much to The Guardian and Manchester Confidential’s displeasure. But first let’s start from the beginning.

The aforementioned right-leaning publication had a bash at Manchester City Council over plans to close leisure and other public facilities, while refusing to axe high paid public sector positions. Then that local lifestyle website we namechecked responded by picking apart the rather spurious points made in the initial argument.

The very same paper also renewed its anti-BBC moving to Glasgow and Salford stance, by reporting through gritted teeth on the £1billion moving programme, to be paid for by license holders. This was met by a piece in The Guardian defending the move, which made some worthy comments, including the fact that the relocation cost quoted above was actually spread over a 20 year period, and the same facility in London would in fact prove more expensive.

But it would say that, because the response piece was written by Mark Thompson, Director-General of the BBC. Still, we think the northern expansion can only be a good thing. The British media needs to start recognising there are burgeoning creative economies outside the M25, and there’s even the potential to reduce outgoings considering  the cost of living, wages and rents ‘up here’.

Political motivation is afoot all over the country right now, and nowhere more so than in the stories surrounding the country’s second economic city. Cameron and the Coalition say the cuts Manchester City Council recently announced go over and beyond what is required, claiming the local authority is acting in an attempt to demonise its Government.

In contrast, the representatives of Mancunia say what they are proposing is necessary in order to efficiently, and effectively get spending back to where it needs to be. Funny how two seemingly unconnected stories can be linked so easily. Whether you’re a hardcore conspiracy theorist or not, it’s hard not to believe there would be no renewed furore from the Tory-friendly paper over the broadcaster’s move, if it weren’t concerning an organisation the Conservatives are non to fond of, and a sub-region widely regarded as a Labour stronghold.

That’s not to say we’re foolish, though. To believe Manchester City Council’s each and every word is probably not the best idea anyone’s ever had, so we keep our distance. But from our point of view these two subjects should be kept separate. Big bucks for public employees and deep cuts to services never makes good reading, but neither does a media obsessed with just one place. Factor in the creation of new jobs, and it would be nice to think people could concentrate on the positive aspects of this momentous move out of London.

Image (C) Doug Johnston

Share

A slice of pie for hungry publishers?

Thursday, February 24th, 2011

Welcome to the future. It’s the middle of the 21st Century and things have changed. Desperate for credible information, fact hungry citizens scour unreliable source after unreliable source online, trying to find some real news.

The major papers have closed down, or been absorbed into increasingly monolithic media groups. What we are told has never come from so few places, meaning bias can go unchallenged, and authenticity is difficult to confirm.

People loved it when The Telegraph became the first British paper to launch online. And when the rest joined, everyone thought ‘this can only be a good thing’. But then they stopped paying cover prices, while advertisers refused to buy as much space. Independent journalism died, and unfunded, untrained citizen reporters were incapable of filling the gap.

Thankfully it hasn’t got that far, yet. But the world needs to wake up to the nightmare it’s sleepwalking into. Choice and plurality of news is essential in a democracy, a point Apple and Google both seem to understand. The technology giants plan on allowing publishers to charge users for content- whether that’s a monthly subscription, single article access, or live video stream.

Naturally, scores of people have rather foolishly complained, and blindly chorused ‘the internet should be free’. And of course there’s plenty of room for open content. But professional journalism is online too, without the ability to generate enough revenue to cover its costs. If in 20 years there is half the foreign current affairs coverage of today we shouldn’t need to explain why it will be bad news.

It should also be noted that receiving the news for free is a very recent concept the public have got familiar with in a worryingly short space of time. Really this is about returning things to the status quo. So we welcome the proposals, though our favourite brand of computers seems to have been unnecessarily profit-minded about it.

By opting to sell via Apple’s App Store a publisher will lose a rather whopping 30 per cent of all takings to the host. In contrast, Google claims its paywall is not for profit, a fashionable statement made believable by the ten per cent surcharge it plans on handing to its clients.

This leads to more worries for those considering investing. Tablet technology is still in its infancy, and looks set to be dominated by the iPad as the forseeable future plays out. This means it could well be some time before the Android equivalents catch up enough to offer any real returns, but then once they do these will be markedly greater. Though healthier than a month ago, whichever way you look at it, this is still tough position to be in, proving that publishing and the simple life remain poles apart.

Share

Going to hold it against Britney?

Monday, February 21st, 2011

The Mail offers its razor sharp, super useful insight

Now, call me old, miserable and behind the times…. but this new Britney Spears video -  Hold it against me – who likes this kind of thing? Teenagers? Under 10′s? QVC addicts?

Product placement is nothing new but I was surprised that url’s didn’t flash up to match the clunky branded shots <JUSTINCASE> you missed them.  Is she really so skint that she needs to turn her promo into a kaleidoscope of random products?

Oh and no, it’s not ironic. Neither is it a metaphor.

We all know Britney has car crash tendencies, but everyone wanted her to pull it around. Pop fan or not, few will deny enjoying the music of her pre-skinhead crying-in-the-gutter, not-that-innocent sex bomb phase.

Fast forward to Hold it Against Me, and it wouldn’t be surprising if people began turning against the one time pop princess. Much has been made of the fact this is ripped off from the Bellamy Brothers – but what of the expression; ‘If I said you had a beautiful body would you hold it against me?’ Surely this is nothing more than the slur of a drunken, sleazy, middle-aged fool, shouted, spittle and all, across the dancefloor of some puke-stained nightclub. It’s up there with ‘get your coat you’ve pulled’ on the list of things normal people simply don’t say.

Digressions aside, Brit’s record company released 14 sneak previews of this new ‘highly awaited video’ from director Jonas Åklerlund (he’s the guy who was also responsible for Lady Gaga’s Telephone)…. anticipation is essential these days, but surely this a case of overkill?

You have to question if her management plan on using the video as a catalyst to set Britney off on a direct course towards another episode,like some twisted PR strategy. Just imagine the brainstorming notes…

Racy school uniform on underage teen Brit – DONE
Pop star boyfriend – DONE
Kids & regulation naked baby bump shot – DONE
Drunken Vegas wedding – DONE
Knickerless shots – <OVER> DONE

“OK, so the breakdown worked, let’s go back there for a while, everyone will go crazy when she makes another comeback! ”

So I asked around – in case it was just me thinking “Who is this wobbly redneck doing a bit of karaoke in her wedding dress whilst trying to forget she’s been divorced for many years and lives in a trailer?”. ‘The kids’ at SGPR HQ feel sorry for her, but who wants pity? Our resident music journalist was more eloquent…

“It hurts my eyes, and not in the straining to watch something on a screen for eight hours way, rather more like someone sticking hot pins into my retinae. There is no thought behind the concept, with almost everything stolen from the step by step guide to making something look cheap, and unimaginative. There’s also too much product in shot on numerous occasions, which nobody has tried to hide. People are wise to this, especially when it’s done so obviously, making this look ridiculous in extremis.  And Britney is well passed those crop top and knicker combinations…”

So there you have it Britney. Sack the stylist at least.

Share

Social Media? It’s old news

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

Originally coded in just ten days, My Space recently underwent a rather hasty, poorly-executed face lift. With little done to improve its reputation, the number of registered accounts continues to decline, largely because of the painfully slow streaming media, and cumbersome methods of conversation it offers.

Now News Corp is selling its shares in the company, and word is that days are numbered. Like any sensible PR agency in the North West, we know not to believe spurious statements, but there’s no denying that My Space has remained prominent largely thanks to musicians and those in associated industries. Many of these people are now jumping ship to the more stable, highly specialised Sound Cloud, so alarm bells must be ringing.

You could easily believe this represents the first great fall from grace for a dominant force on the social media landscape. That’s actually far from the real truth, as the roots of electronic discourse can be traced back almost half a century…

In the beginning there was sound
Emerging from the 1950s, phreaking (the telephone version of hacking) saw communities of technophiles host remote conferences and discuss new developments, often in a bid to avoid hefty national and international call charges. And, according to Dead Dinosaur, the CB radio, with its code words, usernames and etiquette, also resembles an early network.

Enter the technology age
By the mid-70s computers were seen as the future of business. Locals in San Francisco began using Community Memory, the first ever electronic noticeboard, to leave messages on subjects categorised by keywords for others to search and read. People were sharing ideas. It might have been via one computer in a record shop, but nonetheless help, advice, and friendships were all possible without having met or spoken, for the first time in history.

Fanning the flames
Bulletin Board Systems (BBS) had become increasingly prevalent by the 1980s. The Whole Earth ‘Lectronic Link (WELL) had also arrived, largely thanks to an international effort to repair a downed helicopter in the Himalayas. It wasn’t long before terms like flame war were being banded about, as a new platform for mud-slinging had emerged, while a BBS called Usenet began distributing a sign of things to come- the first web browser.

Upload your profile
The first truly modern social networks arrived as the dotcom bubble swelled. In the mid-90s Geocities invited the world to set up subject specific mini-websites. Around this time The Globe begins pioneering blogs by offering the chance to self-publish. And, a little later, AOL starts to push its Instant Messenger service, while the defunct Sixdegrees.com introduces profiles, personalising the experience and giving future sites a blueprint.

After the crash
As the millennium approached people panicked about planes falling from the sky. That didn’t happen, but the value of web businesses did drop. The smoke cleared as online retail rallied a comeback, and people started talking about ‘web 2.0’. The user-generated era had arrived, as had Friendster, a network that still boasts some 90 million users. My Space opens circa 2003, followed by Facebook 12 months later, and then Twitter in 2006.

Wherever you are
It would be easy to leave it there, but in truth GPS and 3G mobile technology has added another significant step. Now we’re checking into bars via our phones, and claiming all kinds of discounts at shops, hotels, clubs and restaurants- to name but a few businesses in on the act. Social Networking is mobile, and responsive to our location. If history is anything to go off this isn’t the last chapter, so watch this space for further developments.

Share

G’day! An upside down look at consumer PR

Friday, February 11th, 2011

Lorna O’Neill is a highly regarded PR who has worked at some of the best agencies in the North of England before carving an enviable reputation for herself Down Under. In this guest blog she casts an eye over the different challenges facing consumer PR agencies compared to back home. And, unbelievably, she manages to avoid discussing her beloved Liverpool FC:

When I moved to the other side of the world to pursue my career in PR I thought, new media to learn, contacts to make but how different can it be, right? Wrong! Moving to Sydney Australia has been a learning curve from start to finish.

I am an account director for a leading consumer PR agency in Sydney, Polkadot PR with clients across a spectrum of sectors including beauty, fashion, health & wellbeing, food & drink and leisure/lifestyle.

Ok, of course, some things remain the same – clients work with us because they want us to manage their reputation, build their brands and get people talking about them. And we do it very well.

The challenge has been carefully adapting what tactics I might have employed back in the competitive UK news media landscape to the Aussie one. The changes are often minor but nonetheless important.  Here are a couple of insights into the life of an Aussie PR consultant….

NEWSPAPERS
I always knew that selling in to the media at home was tough – if your story doesn’t have ‘legs’, forget it, but I realised just how tough when I moved away from it and came here two years ago. For a country of such a vast size, you would be amazed how few newspapers have a ‘national’ scope to sell your story in to. With only one, true national newspaper in ‘The Australian’ it is extremely business, hard news and political in content. You can forget your consumer survey story on how we are a nation of secret snackers or 1 in 3 of us think about a famous person when we are having sex!

Next is what we call the ‘metro’ publications which cover the states (New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and alike). The Daily Telegraph (Sydney), The Herald Sun (Melbourne), are all examples of these and are slightly ‘softer’ in content but still very much cover the harder news with a mixture of both national and metro focus. I would say that I see on average, just two or three PR-led stories per week in these daily newspapers. Wow.
In light of tragic storms, floods and cyclones over here in the last two months, all of the newspapers have been very much doom and gloom, not the time to sell in light PR stories. That’s where there is no difference between here and the UK. To be a strong consultant you have to be across the media agenda and know when the time is right for your story.

The best bet for PR in the newspapers here is mX – this is the free daily newspaper handed out on the buses and trains and a great read (exactly like the Metro). They love a good picture story, stunt or quirky consumer survey. mX is tailored for Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane once again but with the majority of content syndicated across all three, giving us PR’s that much needed national scope. Get your client in mX and they’re delighted!

Then you have your regional and suburban newspapers. The best reference in UK terms is your Manchester Evening News (regional) and Ormskirk Advertiser (suburban – had to get that one in being my beloved home town and all). Now you must put this in perspective, the MEN is how far from the Bolton News or Liverpool Echo…30 min to one hour drive max? Here down under, you’re talking anything up to 8 hours’ drive between towns. I still find it hard to comprehend, so unless your story or product is truly as local as it gets, it can be tough to get in, as essentially, many of these suburban towns (with one post office, one pub and a corner shop), no disrespect intended – would have no idea what you’re on about.

CONTENT
To be a great consultant in the UK, and why Smoking Gun gets such great results for its clients, is because they know the media inside-out. They know where you fit, where you don’t and if you don’t how to make it happen. Here down under it’s no different and the biggest challenge when you first move here is not having the luxury of having grown up as a child reading the Sunday newspapers with your Dad. As well as learning the media for your job, you can’t undervalue how much it being part of your whole life makes you ‘know it’. Here it’s like starting from scratch and where I take pride from my experience is how much I personally threw myself into this area, ensuring I was strong offering to a potential employer. It was refreshing too – still is. I LOVE the media, so learning a whole load of newspapers, magazines and websites was a joy.

Even across such a small range of ‘national’ newspapers, one thing here is very prevalent. You just can’t be too shocking or risqué. Forget survey stories that lead with a quirky sex angle or pictures of women with their breasts out. I have a 19 year old colleague here, starting his career having moved 8 hours from his tiny village in the West to big bad Sydney. He has never been to the UK or in fact anywhere outside of Australia and literally cannot fathom that more than one of our national newspapers has a daily ‘page 3’ girl practically naked. Hilarious.

A good client example I want to share is a memory foam bra with NASA technology, so when it heats up it boosts your cleavage. They approached Polkadot PR to launch the bra in Australia to buy online after a successful launch in the UK. Well, my UK PR-head switches on and I’m in the brainstorm having a field day, “3,2,1 LIFT OFF” or “Get Horny and bigger boobs”, or asking the Sun girls if they fancy a photo shoot wearing it while rubbing each other in oil – you get the idea. Well you can forget even entertaining the word horny here or such imagery! The UK agency sent over a plethora of coverage from the UK and it was impressive to say the least, but I wasn’t surprised – of course the tabloids loved it!

So, what did we do? We crafted a really clever campaign to suit the media landscape here. A tasteful photoshoot in a space centre in Sydney for the NASA link, sexy but not, dare I say ‘page 3’ looking model, skirts with their bras rather than thongs (or a hand covering their modesty!).

The press release headline read ‘NASA TECHNOLOGY TAKES AUSSIE WOMEN’S BREASTS TO NEW HEIGHTS’ with line one utilising the ‘lift off’ tag….and it worked. A story was sold into the number one primetime evening TV show (magazine-style, like Granada Reports) called TODAY TONIGHT and a full feature on the bra’s arrival in Australia, interview with the brains behind the scientific invention and it catapulted the brand here and sales are going well. Check it out

One thing’s for sure, working over here has without doubt has been a great decision in terms of my career development and expanding my skill set. The more you experience, the more you grow and improve….but my guilty pleasure…. I can’t say I don’t miss reading about Wayne Rooney’s latest affair on a Sunday morning or daily updates on the X Factor house and its contestants. Sigh…(and thank god for the internet!)

Share

Human Robots

Thursday, February 10th, 2011


For public relations agencies like us, having a smartphone is essential. It’s just a shame some models are so difficult to use.

When Philip K Dick wrote what is perhaps his most famous work, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, he was asking one question. Can technology mirror people?

To see the film, Blade Runner, is to understand it’s not a cut and dry answer. But one thing is for sure, we all know exactly what the word Android means. So to name a smartphone operating system, billed as the iPhone beater, after these bio-tech creations makes a strong statement about intuitive, logical, and (dare it be said) natural interfaces.

Of all major mobile manufacturers, only Nokia, Apple and RIM haven’t opted to use the Android system. The latter, responsible for the Blackberry brand, is still seen as the first point of call for business users, though the iPhone has hit the market hard, and offers sleeker style and greater interaction. The result has seen successive software updates for the oldest mass-produced mobile internet device in Britain as it looks to improve its image.

Needless to say, Apple won’t budge from their inimitable IOS. Nokia, on the other hand, has seen its Symbian system knocked off the top spot for the first time. Taking into account the fact that, according to research firm Canalys, the global smartphone market has grown 89 per cent on 12 months ago, it all adds up to some big bucks, irrespective of how popular a specific platforms is, though that might offer little solace for most manufacturers.

Except for the brains behind Android that is. The developers found themselves on top of the pile recently, at a time when all predictions point to mobile phones soon replacing computers as the main tool for accessing the internet. It’s success is not by a mile, but still this is a significant boast to be able to make, especially when you consider that the competition represents some of the biggest brands in global technology.

Share

Smoking Gun wins people’s choice award

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

It’s one of the greatest accolades a marketing, PR or creative agency can receive. Internal industry recognition is great, but earning a place on the Recommended Agency Register pips the rest to the post.

And there’s one simple reason why. RAR status is only given to companies whose clients believe they have excelled in a particular field. So that we’re listed across industries like food and drink, FMCG, retail, leisure, travel, charity, sport, property, fashion, automotive, and digital proves we’ve been doing a few things right.

To our loyal customers, who have rewarded our countless nights of toil under the Manchester sky, we say thank you. We’re glad we got people talking about your brand, and helped your company to tell some stories. In return, we’re thrilled you’ve been chatting about us, and hope to give you plenty more to discuss over the next few months.

Share

Wish you were here

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

GPS based applications for smartphones are nothing new. These days things have come a long way since Foursquare, what with Facebook Places and now Google Latitude both on the map. But are they really a good idea?

Put simply, a concept that began as an idea to offer discounts and rewards for ‘checking in’ (and promoting) somewhere, has grown into a service that looks to bring friends together, even in unlikely places. By sharing locations you can find out who you know close by, and meet up. But there’s always an issue, and when you’re making people’s compass point public, the problems are tenfold.

Privacy concerns and Facebook go together like scandal and the tabloids. Though it’s not so much of a happy marriage, the pair have been impossible to separate since the public realised users could abuse the information stored on the social network. And as for Google, daddies of the internet, multiple controversies surrounding the Earth programme, not to mention the public’s concerns over content control, put the brand in a similar light.

What this shows is that both organisations have previously acted before fully considering the consequences. It’s not that they set out to betray confidences, but in the end that’s what the victims must surely feel like. And now it’s not just phone numbers, or faces being captured and included in online maps. This time it’s the exact location someone is in, their regular movements and favourite haunts. In short, you could potentially map out a person’s habitual behaviour.

It’s a scary thought to say the least. Still though, we’ve made it this far in an age of information overload and data security scares. And, obviously, we’re pretty partial to a tweet or two, meaning any developments on the social media side of things are fascinating to us (and we’re usually first in line). So our jury’s out on this one, but we’d love to know where yours is right now.

Share

iPhoneography- another word for nothing?

Tuesday, February 8th, 2011

The label says it all, but basically we’re talking about photography competitions with iPhones. You may think you don’t care about this latest Mac mania, but these days staying on top of things like this can pay out some serious profit.

Easily the most advanced in terms of available apps, Apple’s must have mobile has plenty of software capable of impressively altering images. Hipstamatic lowers resolutions and turns photos into Polaroids. Colour Splash adds hues to parts of a monochrome picture. Photoburst takes 10 sports shots per second. And that’s just mentioning three.

With all this technology available to support the device, and the best quality screen on the planet, it’s easy to understand why iPhoneography has become so popular. Less obvious, though just as important, is the benefit to businesses hidden therein.

If you actively engage with your customers online, then the recent Creative Boost competition is still worth checking out. The prize was a Macbook Air, and in order to win, entrants needed to take the best possible picture with an iPhone, and edit it in FX Photo Studio.

The results are rather impressive. MacPhunn LLC was behind the contest, designed to draw attention to the aforementioned editing app- a leading photo focused iPhone download. But the possibilities are endless once you start thinking about user driven campaigns for your brand. Let people get creative and have fun, and in return new customers will be drawn to your 21st Century thinking company.

Share