Archive for the ‘Media News’ Category

$1billion for a faded old picture- shrewd or stupid?

Thursday, April 12th, 2012

As many people who keep an eye on the digital media landscape will already know, this week has seen the sale of a company that designed an image-editing smartfone application fetch a staggering amount of money for its ex-owners. Like us here at one of central Manchester’s best public relations agencies, the final figure paid out may have raised a few eyebrows, but what’s the real value behind this deal?

We are, of course, referring to Instagram, which Facebook has just bought for the not so small sum of $1billion. The programme allows users to take pictures with their phones, and then share them with friends after applying a filter to the photograph to make it look like a Polaroid. So why is making a no-doubt average quality shot (no offence, smartphone users, but you’re hardly Jeremy Bailey) look like an older, but still average shot so valuable to a firm that already has the world and their brother posting status updates on its network.

It’s a query compounded by the fact that we are increasingly being told video, not still imagery, is the future of the internet. But then this notion misses a key point in that Joe Public is a very different beast from Tech Geek and New Media Wizard. In short, those that can be bothered will experiment with video, but anyone who felt a little frustrated after two minutes tinkering on iMovie will almost certainly continue to point and click with a still camera in order to retain a visual record, rather than spending half a day preparing a five minute clip.

Clearly there’s a long way to go before we’re all editing footage to create shorts to share with friends, so for the time being a photograph is still the choice medium for the average social networker with a visual penchant. As such by buying up Instagram Facebook is not only ensuring they control a rival (albeit far smaller) social network, but it’s also claiming a large stake in the burgeoning user generated image marketplace, with the new acquisition already boasting 30million members and counting.

On top of this, as Instagram is used through mobile phones, Zuckerberg and Co have secured another tool with which to target the mobile media customer. It’s a hugely important step, as a large number of Facebook profiles are still only updated from a desktop computer. As such it’s clear there’s more to this than one company simply fancying a pop at photography-focused computer software. Furthermore, these points suggest that whilst there are never guarantees, the real value to the buyer here has potential to reach far beyond what was originally paid.

  • Share/Bookmark

Facebook most searched brand of 2011

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

New data from internet traffic analyst Experian Hitwise, released at the end of last month, reveals the most searched for brand on the face of the world wide web during 2011 was Facebook, the most popular social network. No surprises there then, as it was the same story 12 months earlier.

YouTube, which is in fact the world’s second most popular search engine, ranked at number two in the list, with the number one option for internet queries- Google- managing seventh in the league, which is rather impressive considering most of our web browsers now link directly to said site, so we don’t have to request it via a search. The planet’s top news website, Mail Online, is the only journalistic outlet aside from the BBC to appear (at #9), with retailers ebay (#3), Amazon (#4), Argos (#5), and Next (#10) all showing up too.

Perhaps the most staggering of all the numbers to come out of the report is that Facebook now represents 2% of all UK internet searches, which if nothing else begs the question ‘why do more people not use bookmarks or auto-complete?’ A copy of the full table is below, whilst the original press release that caught our eye can be found over here at hitwise.com

Top Search Brands of 2011 - Experian Hitwise

  • Share/Bookmark

More Google content related (bad) news

Thursday, April 5th, 2012

It seems like not a week passes by without some news emerging suggesting there may be problems with the results provided by the world’s most powerful search engine. Well, actually it was a fortnight since the last time we discussed this, but still more fingers have been pointing.

On March 22nd, from our Manchester PR base, we blogged on how MPs had voiced concerns over Google’s seemingly lackadaisical attitude towards removing offensive content from search results. This followed a similar-ish post in January about how representatives of entertainment firms (record labels, film distributors and the like) had made recommendations to the UK Government concerning the prevalence of illegal filesharing sites in Google and Bing results.

All of which make for pretty big news from where we’re sitting. Yesterday things took a turn for the even more suspicious though, as travel website TripAdvisor filed a complaint with the European Commission over anti-competitiveness within Google’s practices. The accusation stems from a perceived distortion in organic search results, meaning Google Places allegedly ranks higher than other companies, leading some to believe the search engine is giving preferential treatment to its own products.

A decision now has to be made on whether or not to fully pursue the claims, so we’ll have to see what happens, and in the meantime we’re certainly making no judgements. But the most worrying aspect of all this is that similar complaints have been made by Microsoft and a number of other rivals, who have each submitted evidence against Google to the European Commission, meanwhile lastminute.com supports TripAdvisor’s claims, and Expedia has accused the search giant of breaching European law, apparently. Suffice to say then, this all makes rather uncomfortable reading for anyone with concerns over online transparency, not to mention those with a businesses reliant on search rankings.

  • Share/Bookmark

Friends and enemies: The Daily Mail debate

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

Love it or loathe it with all your heart one thing is abundantly clear; more people are reading The Daily Mail than ever before, in one format or another. So why is the world’s most visited news website from the UK’s ‘paper of the year’ so popular?

It’s a difficult quandary, and we need to begin by defining the difference between The Daily Mail newspaper, which began in 1896 and is read by 4million or so Brits each day, and Mail Online, the website version which started up later and claimed nearly 100million hits in January 2012. The lines are drawn when it comes to content, which should be clear with one quick look at each outlet.

The Daily Mail is traditionally a mid-market title, not a tabloid proper, and finds focus on ‘hard news’ and current affairs. The web version shifts the emphasis towards celebrity or ‘pop news’, and so has a notably younger readership when compared with its elder brother. According to NRS figures the paper is mostly picked up by over 65’s, and hits roughly 16% of that population in the UK. In contrast just 4.4% of British 15-24 year olds do the same.

But data from Alexa, the internet ranking company , shows different demographics online, with 25-54 year olds accounting for the majority of people logging on to check out the latest stories. It’s not like there aren’t hundreds of celebrity oriented websites out there, so why do people keep coming back to Mail Online?

The 116 year old newspaper boasts a loyal (though mature) readership, which results from its clear tone and editorial stance, and this is not to everyone’s liking. But after years working in the PR industry, and having dealt with The Daily Mail on a regular basis, I can tell you that when clients are favourably featured therein the public picks up the phone. In short, the print edition has an enviably influential editorial position; which is the bone of contention for many.

Some say it’s upstanding, and speaks for them, but to others The Daily Mail is guilty of scaremongering, and using shock tactics to promote a right wing stance. Columnists such as Jan Moir and Kelvin MacKenzie are notorious for their uncompromising opinion pieces, and then there’s the actual news content. Two clicks on the unofficial Daily Mail Headline Generator gave us ‘Could Facebook Make the Queen Obese?’ and ‘Will The Poles Ruin England?’.

These might be a little far fetched, but they are also amusing indictments of the paper’s no holds barred attitude towards sensationalising real issues via headlines. For further proof head to Mail Watch, where front pages from The Daily Mail are consistently posted in order to show the title’s contradictory lead stories.

But then there is no shortage of opinion and comment in favour of the paper, and those respectable circulation figures are no coincidence. Nor is the fact it boasts more female readers than male- the only UK national to do this. All of which results from well targeted content that speaks to people. As such the enduring nature of the print edition is down to subjectivity and reader preference, but the overwhelming success of Mail Online is, at least in part, due to an additional factor.

As online marketing magazine The Drum explained last month, the website’s exponential growth and marketplace dominance owes much to a dedicated team of SEO specialists who take articles, add in keywords to help attract internet traffic from search engines, and then post the stories live. If nothing else it’s proof, again, of why companies can benefit from a broad range of skills, even when the industry is considered a niche marketplace.

Like so many other successful concepts, to ignore this evidence when it comes to your own business interests would be unwise, if not potentially damaging to future opportunities. There’s no denying it makes sense, regardless of whether you agree with the Daily Mail or not, but before taking any steps to implement this we’d like to hear what you think, so why not use the comments form below to tell us your opinion on Britain’s most divisive of newspapers.

  • Share/Bookmark

How to… get the most out of the fresh-look Facebook

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

With over 700million users the world’s most popular social network was familiar to many people. This month huge changes to the interface are taking place, but by reading this you’ll understand exactly how your business’ brand page can benefit.

OK, so we know someone once said something about how if it wasn’t broke then a fix wasn’t required. But still, things never stay the same, least of all in the rapid fire world of web based media.  Regardless of whether they’re welcome or not then Facebook’s changes are happening, meaning you need to get to know the fresh faced site. Take a look at these five key factors of the all new interface to ensure the switchover is smooth.

Where’s my landing page?

Landing pages, or fan gates, have been removed, meaning you can’t ask people to Like your page in order to see its content. Controversial, yes, but at least you can get creative with a clean looking Cover Image to dominate the top of your Timeline.

Telling your story

The emphasis is now on storytelling via your Timeline, which acts as a diary for your posts. Highlight stories by starring them and post larger photo and video content for stunning image-based pages, with pictures stretching right across the screen. Meanwhile, pinning trophy pieces to the top of a page focuses attention.

An event worth shouting about

A fantastic opportunity to tell the brand story in an easy to digest way, simply click on the line in the middle of your Timeline, select Milestone, and then fill out specific information. Whether it’s the date you founded the firm or a major launch event you can let the picture, and a few well chosen words, do the talking.

Improved apps and content management


Pre-define applications to sit at the top of your Timeline, and even add a call to action to the description for competition purposes. On top of this you can approve user posts before they appear on your Timeline, whilst those from Fans now appear in the bottom right, just below posts about your brand made by their friends, further socialising the experience whilst keeping your company messages in focus.

More feedback, please


Interactions between Fans and brands will be more direct, as individuals can now send Private Messages to a company. Once the lines of communication have opened it’s a two way street too, so your business can respond to a particular person without the public watching, which could be a game changer.

Of course it won’t be too long until a whole host of additional alterations are made to the Facebook modus- after all, the world’s most popular social network didn’t get so big by standing still. So what would you like to see changed about the way it currently works? Why not let us know via the comments form below.

  • Share/Bookmark

Social media for the design savvy: Pinterest

Wednesday, March 28th, 2012

There’s no shortage of press flying around about the world’s newest online network. With 4,000% growth in four months this isn’t surprising, but should we really bother spending time getting to grips with it?

We’ve all seen social networks come and go, so when people start spouting superlatives about another startup it’s easy to cast such comments aside as hype. But then clearly from the opening statistic, Pinterest, the social network in question, is attracting a huge number of eyes to its pages.

More so, it’s pointing them on to even more, with a better rate of referral traffic than YouTube, Google+, and LinkedIn combined. Needless to say then, it can pay to be on the end of those links, but first and foremost it’s important to establish that this isn’t Facebook, or Twitter, or…

As some have put it, Pinterest is a lifestyle brand building site. Not that the developers want business or self promotion to become part of day to day activity on the network, apparently. Which is surprising, as this is a place for people to post things that interest them- be that a photo, video, article or blog- and have it presented in cleanly designed glory, a great way to advertise services or stock.

The real question is whether Pinterest is right for your brand. So far the biggest take up has been amongst women aged 25-34, which is indicative of the way things have a kind of ‘fashion spread’ feel to them, with a clear visual focus. As such without content that suits great video and pictures it’s really a redundant resource, but clothes brands, design firms, freelance creatives, food manufacturers, retailers, entertainment firms, and more should certainly take note.

An estimated 3.3million unique users access the site every month with wheat in mind, not chaff. So only quality posts- or ‘Pins’- are any use, as you’re looking for someone to ‘re-pin’ the content they like from your page to theirs. This means you don’t want mindless clutter, and it’s vital you think in terms of longevity.

Someone may have stumbled upon your Pinterest account accidentally, which means there’s no guarantee they’re going to comeback. Those purely using the platform for advertising experience a far lower number of returning fans and get less followers than those pushing content from other sources. Again, the comparisons with a lifestyle magazine are prominent; it’s about recommending the best to people, and making sure they refer to you as a high standard source; standard social media behaviour, really.

Of course there’s nothing to stop you running competitions, and opening things up to ‘guest pinners’, allowing people to pin whatever interests them to your noticeboard. Take a look at the so-called ‘World’s First Pinterest Campaign’, which saw Kotex use the network to find 50 Israeli women, and what inspires them, before creating individual gift boxes based on what each had on their Pinterest noticeboard. Take a look at the video below:

That’s about as business focused as the network can get at the moment though, so really it’s all about redirecting traffic to your site (the items pinned act as links to the source material). This also means doing the same in reverse, so promoting your Pinterest account via Facebook, Twitter, and all other online outlets is a must. After all, this is a social network for sharing, not simply communicating.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Blagger’s Blog 23rd March 2012

Friday, March 23rd, 2012

A weekly roundup of talking points, sans effort

Worth the paper it’s printed on?

Last week’s light news success stories included…

…Britain’s Got Talent, which is set for a return to our screens and as such made 71 headlines, whereas the Government’s NewBuy scheme to help first timers get on the property ladder only bagged 55…

…Russell Brand, who landed himself in legal strife after throwing a photographer’s mobile phone through a window, with 43 articles reporting on the news, in contrast the Kony 2012 video about child soldiers only featured in 42 (despite 83million YouTube hits)…

…and finally, David Beckham eating a burrito whilst out for lunch with his family, the crux of 32 stories, whereas Bo Xilai, a leading Chinese government official, was sacked by the Communist party after attempting to prevent a police inquiry into his family and only appeared in 38.

(Source: Journalisted)

Weekly high

Coca Cola has been responsible for some of the most timeless adverts of all time. This latest for the calorie free Zero product may not be quite as memorable as ‘Holidays are coming’, but still, we like the idea.

Weekly low

If you’ve got Google, use it. Released in time for St Patrick’s Day, Nike’s new Dunk Low sneaker is called the Black and Tan. Unfortunately that’s also the nickname given to a notoriously brutal British paramilitary unit of the 1920s, invoking bad memories.

Battle of the tweets: Manchester vs London vs Sheffield

Top Manchester #tags (seven days to 23/3/2012)

#prayformuamba #mufc

#mcfc #muamba

#manchester #budget2012

#bwfc #cfc

#together #f1

The cause of Fabrice Muamba’s cardiac arrest, which left him dead for 78 minutes after he was struck down during a Bolton Wanderers game, remains unknown as he recovers in hospital, so naturally plenty of people are talking about it. In more upbeat news the 2012 Budget is out…

Top London #tags (seven days to 23/3/2012)

#prayformuamba #f1

#budget2012 #cfc

#eastenders #muamba

#lfc #budget

#theapprentice

In London, home of our coalition Government, that Budget is high on the agenda, what with the controversial ‘Granny Tax’ and reduced 50p rate. Less dividing lines can be seen regarding Muamba’s collapse mind, with everyone showing solidarity for the sportsman.

Top Austin #tags (seven days to 23/3/2012)

#swfc #prayformuamba

#sufc #budet2012

#sheffield #twitterblades

#theapprentice #f1

#ssn

Both teams in Sheffield- Wednesday and United- are still riding high down in League One, and on the local Twitter sphere (#twitterblades, #swfc, #sufc). Aside from this there’s also that small matter of BBC’s smash TV series The Apprentice, which is back again.

That was The Blagger’s Blog, a selection of statements, statistics and noteworthy newsies from across the media and social world, amalgamated, allowing the time-starved professional to start a conversation from thin air.

If there is a success story, blunder, or tweeting town you’d like to see included email hello@smokinggunpr.co.ukor tweet using #blaggersblog. Happy Friday!

  • Share/Bookmark

Google in deep over content, part two

Thursday, March 22nd, 2012

Back in January we commented on the fact the world’s biggest and bestest search engine, along with its wide-eyed little rival Bing, had been accused of promoting illegal entertainment content (primarily movies and music) by recommending illegitimate websites on results pages. Now it seems similar grumblings can again be heard on the fibre-optic grapevine.

As The Guardian reported yesterday morning Google appears to have landed itself in hot water again, this time with British MPs voicing concerns over the ease of finding ‘controversial content’, and a lackadaisical attitude towards removing such results. The example given is the Max Mosley sex scandal, wherein a video purportedly showing the Formula 1 team boss in a Nazi-themed orgy was circulated on the internet, with critics suggesting the search engine could have acted faster, and with more conviction.

A committee will meet next week on the situation, with other incidents such as Ryan Giggs and the super-injunctions no doubt also set to form part of the debate. As for Google, representatives have said they do not have processes in place to track and automatically remove duplicates of text or pictures, meaning this has to be done by hand- a lengthy process. So, is this a woeful misjudgement on the part of the information gatekeepers, or should we not expect that, once in the public domain, incendiary content will always spread like wildfire?

  • Share/Bookmark

BBC’s Barcelona means you’ll never want for anything

Thursday, March 15th, 2012

Most decent TV shows, and plenty of not so great failures, make it onto DVD these days, and in the next couple of years even more will be available on Blu-ray. But if the future is solid state data storage- from films to music- then obviously we’ll be needing these transferring to digital files, rather than physical items.

As ever the BBC, along with numerous other broadcasters no doubt, has already been thinking about this, and believe the solution is ‘Project Barcelona’. Quite why it’s been given such a title is unclear, as this is about entertainment, not covert operations abroad. Regardless, it’s a sign of the times that promises much, including the opportunity for renewed criticism directed at Auntie.

Quite simply the idea is this: allow programmes shown on BBC to be downloaded for keeps immediately after they’re aired on TV. Obviously this answers the age old quandary of how to get our hands on ‘that show’; there simply aren’t enough hours in the year to commit everything screened to home release proper, so some gems are still woefully unavailable. This, of course, sounds like a fantastic idea. There is at least one potential problem though.

Bosses at the Beeb have already made a statement in response to the suggestion that there may be some naysayers that have an issue with people paying £1.89 for a programme they have already funded through a license fee. Pre-emptive yes, but it’s a good comeback, using the example of DVD and VHS, wherein the public happily pays extra to take home and watch at their own leisure. All of which is fair enough.

Yet this attitude disregards an integral point. Physical items cost far more money to produce, granted not the £15 price tag a shiny disc often tries to convince us is reasonable, but still more than a digital equivalent. And, regardless of the fact computer files also require investment to get right (someone has to create and master them), most of the public don’t want to acknowledge this. That’s why free music is everywhere, and we can now store an overwhelming amount of TV shows, recorded at the touch of a button, on an average digital box. Regardless of technological progress then, the same issues with ownership may still prevail… we shall see.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Blagger’s Blog 9th March 2012

Friday, March 9th, 2012

A weekly roundup of talking points, sans effort

Worth the paper it’s printed on?

Last week’s light news success stories included…

…Angelina Jolie and her right leg appearing at the Oscars, with 58 stories reporting on the sight, whilst Jacqui Hames, an ex-Metropolitan police officer, was apparently phone hacked, intimidated, and placed under surveillance by the News of the World and appeared in just 25…

…Rihanna, her hair salvaging operation and Jonathan Ross flirtation securing the singer 35 headlines, in contrast Government plans to potentially privatise the police only made it into 17…

…and finally, Brad Pitt’s Oscar appearance, with 52 articles focused on his part at said event, far more than the 25 that reported on retired UK businessman Christopher Tappin being extradited to the US.

(Source: Journalisted)

Weekly high

There are daring advertising campaigns and then there are really daring advertising campaigns. Then there’s this effort by the EMDA Israeli Alzheimer Association. At the country’s largest multiplex cinema attendees expecting to get what they paid for were initially shown the wrong movie in an attempt to re-create the confusion those suffering from the illness experience. Powerful stuff.

Weekly low

Would it be inappropriate for a dating company specialising in matching young women with older, wealthier men to offer a 2-for-1 membership, encouraging more girls into the ’sugar baby’ lifestyle, to celebrate Women’s Month and female empowerment? Well, yes, it most definitely would. #PRfail indeed.

Battle of the tweets: Manchester vs London vs Bristol

Top Manchester #tags (seven days to 8/3/2012)

#mcfc #manchester

#cfc #sometimesyouhaveto

#10beautifulpeopleifollow #thingsthatpissmeoff

#takemeout

A decidedly quiet week in Cottonopolis sees the ever popular TV show #Takemeout and usual suspects Manchester City (#mcfc) dominate conversation, with Chelsea (#cfc) also making an appearance. What a lack of United (#mufc) means is anyone’s guess…

Top London #tags (seven days to 8/3/2012)

#arsenal #cfc

#afc #10beautifulpeopleifollow

#top100femalelies #sometimesyouhaveto

#lfc

As per things in the capital follow a similar pattern to our own hometown, so all quiet on the southern front then. If anything is worthy of note it would surely be Chelsea (#cfc) and the change of management, along with London’s seeming distrust of women (#femalelies).

Top Bristol #tags (seven days to 8/3/2012)

#bristol #takemeout

#top100femalelies #somethingsilearnedlongago

#replacingmeangirlsquoteswithbacon #10beautifulpeopleifollow

#arsenal

#arsenal nearly make it into all three lists (#afc), whilst various lists of beautiful people followed on Twitter does. Elsewhere and #replacingmeangirlsquoteswithbacon is quite possibly the longest of these daisy chain messages we’ve ever seen.

That was The Blagger’s Blog, a selection of statements, statistics and noteworthy newsies from across the media and social world, amalgamated, allowing the time-starved professional to start a conversation from thin air.

If there is a success story, blunder, or tweeting town you’d like to see included email hello@smokinggunpr.co.ukor tweet using #blaggersblog. Happy Friday!

  • Share/Bookmark